Generative AI can identify information and present it in a very convincing way, but remember, it doesn’t know if its sources are correct or not. This means output might be biased, misleading or wrong. Information could also be out-of-date (ChatGPT data cuts off at 2021) and accuracy will vary from subject to subject, depending on how much has been written already.
As generative AI does not critically evaluate the content it produces or its information sources, it’s important to be wary of any secondary sources cited. They may be fictitious, unreliable or completely unrelated to the subject area. You should use the same caution with a generative AI that you would with non-academic sources, such as Wikipedia, and always verify information and sources independently.
If unsure if it’s appropriate to use generative AI for your academic work, discuss it with your tutor before submitting it. Unless you are advised it is acceptable, don’t use it.
If you’re permitted to use generative AI, you must fully acknowledge and reference it (see ‘How do I reference that I’ve used AI?’ below). You must receive consent before entering work created by others into the AI tool as a prompt.
It’s never acceptable to present something produced by a generative AI tool as your own work (see ‘What’s the penalty for unacknowledged use of AI?’).